DiNARDO v. DiNARDO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because the Husband was still working and had the chance to earn significant bonuses, the final judgment did not truly equalize the parties’ incomes for purposes of determining whether an award of attorney’s fees was proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hanson v. Hanson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-28· cited 8×
• Hoff v. Hoff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-03· cited 7×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Rosen v. Rosen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 318×
• Shrove v. Shrove
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-20· cited 39×
• Brock v. Brock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-02· cited 27×
• Derrevere v. Derrevere
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-23· cited 21×
• Nisbeth v. Nisbeth
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-07· cited 16×
• Parry v. Parry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-28· cited 14×
• Crowley v. Crowley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-24· cited 13×
• Duchesneau v. Duchesneau
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-14· cited 11×
• Rashid v. Rashid
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-21· cited 7×
• Humerickhouse v. Humerickhouse
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-16· cited 5×
• Drew v. Drew
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-19· cited 4×
• Bullock v. Jones
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-29· cited 4×
• Dinardo v. Dinardo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-10· cited 1×