Skip to main content

Gentile v. Gentile

Citations

  • 565 So. 2d 820
  • 1990 WL 107765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that husband's imprudent investments which lost their value in 1987 stock market crash not adequate justification for inequitable distribution of marital assets
  • holding an award of 79% of the husband's income for alimony and support was an abuse of discretion, and appellate courts have not hesitated to find an abuse of discretion in similar awards
  • reversing permanent alimony and child support awards which consumed 79% of husband's net pay
  • finding abuse of discretion in award of 79% of husband’s income
  • husband's mismanagement of family's finances did not constitute marital misconduct to be considered in fashioning distribution scheme
  • traditional alimony depends upon the financial ability of the other spouse to make such payment without substantially endangering his or her own economic status.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Gentile v. Gentile

22 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.