Nevada Supreme Court· 5/17/2001
Gallego v. State
Citations
- 23 P.3d 227
- 117 Nev. 348
- 117 Nev. Adv. Rep. 33
- 2001 Nev. LEXIS 33
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a similar instruction left the jury with a constitutionally accurate impression of the government’s burden of proof
- recognizing that evidence of police investigations and uncharged crimes may be achnissible in a capital penalty hearing
- recognizing that good cause to establish a substitution of counsel is not determined by the defendant's subjective perceptions
- holding that a refusal to cooperate with court-appointed counsel is not a proper cause on which to base a request to substitute counsel
- recognizing that evidence of police investigations and uncharged crimes may be admissible in a capital penalty hearing
- recognizing that a dispute over trial strategy alone does not amount to a conflict of interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shearing, Agosti, Rose, Leavitt, Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.