Skip to main content

Gallego v. State

Citations

  • 23 P.3d 227
  • 117 Nev. 348
  • 117 Nev. Adv. Rep. 33
  • 2001 Nev. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a similar instruction left the jury with a constitutionally accurate impression of the government’s burden of proof
  • recognizing that evidence of police investigations and uncharged crimes may be achnissible in a capital penalty hearing
  • recognizing that good cause to establish a substitution of counsel is not determined by the defendant's subjective perceptions
  • holding that a refusal to cooperate with court-appointed counsel is not a proper cause on which to base a request to substitute counsel
  • recognizing that evidence of police investigations and uncharged crimes may be admissible in a capital penalty hearing
  • recognizing that a dispute over trial strategy alone does not amount to a conflict of interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Agosti, Rose, Leavitt, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.