Stephans v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing where evidence admitted at trial was sufficient to sustain the conviction, the remedy for evidentiary error is reversal and remand for new trial
• considering all evidence, even if erroneously admitted, when evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence
• providing where evidence admitted at trial was sufficient to sustain the conviction, the remedy for evidentiary error is SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A (442149) reversal and remand for new trial
• consideration of all evidence appropriate because appellate court cannot know what evidence might have otherwise been offered absent improper ruling
• the remedy for errors unrelated to sufficiency of the evidence is reversal and remand for a new trial, not an acquittal
• the Double Jeopardy Clause mandates acquittal where a conviction is reversed and there is insufficient evidence to support the verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).