Skip to main content

Maestas v. State

Citations

  • 275 P.3d 74
  • 128 Nev. 124
  • 2012 WL 1421838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing for an abuse of discretion a district court's denial of a new trial based On allegedly concealed juror bias
  • explaining that because defendant did not raise the issue in trial court, the record was not sufficiently developed to allow appellate court to determine that any error was \plain\ and therefore the issue was not amenable to review under the plain error rule
  • explaining that because defendant did not raise the issue in trial court, the record was not sufficiently developed to allow appellate court to determine that any error was \plain\ and therefore the issue was not amenable to review under the plain error rule
  • reviewing an unpreserved First Amendment claim for plain error
  • reviewing an unpreserved First Amendment claim for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Saitta, Douglas, Gibbons, Pickering, Hardesty, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.