Nevada Supreme Court· 3/1/2018

Jeremias v. State

Citations

412 P.3d 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a substitute coroner's testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause where she testified to the independent conclusion she had formed based on photographs
concluding that generally a defendant must object, even to alleged structural error, so that the district court has an opportunity to correct it
recognizing that even alleged structural errors must be objected to in district court in order to properly preserve them for appellate review
providing that failure to preserve an error forfeits the right to assert it on appeal
concluding no prejudice resulted from the district court's voir dire errors that occurred in only one small part of the jury-selection process
reaffirming that weighing the aggravating and mitigating circumstances is part of the selection phase, which does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stiglich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.