Skip to main content

Bell v. State

Citations

  • 994 S.W.2d 173
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74
  • 1999 WL 371383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting United States Supreme Court’s holding that it would not violate federal double jeopardy principles to allow the State a second chance to present its proof of a previous conviction
  • overruling Carter v. State, 676 S.W.2d 353 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984), based on Monge
  • adopting United States Supreme Court = s holding that it would not violate federal double jeopardy principles to allow the State a second chance to present its proof of a previous conviction
  • following Monge and holding that federal double-jeopardy principles do not bar the State from a second opportunity to present its proof of a prior conviction for purposes of seeking a cumulated sentence
  • adopting 4 … The amended indictment alleged that Braun had previously been convicted of two other DWI offenses. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04(a) (Vernon 2003), § 49.09(b)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2008
  • overruling Cooper, following Monge, and holding that double jeopardy does not bar the State from a second opportunity to present its proof of a prior conviction for the purpose of seeking a cumulated sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Mansfield, Keller, Price, Holland, Womack, Keasler, Johnson, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.