Skip to main content

Mendez v. State

Citations

  • 212 S.W.3d 382
  • 2006 WL 1501094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that the indictment or information be read to the jury but that the nonjurisdictional enhancement allegations are not read until the punishment phase
  • no category of error is immune to harmless error analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Law, Justices B.A. Smith and Pemberton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.