Ex Parte Quirke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Held, “We hold that 'conviction’ in Sec. 12.42 requires a valid conviction. Quite simply, if a void conviction is used, the State has insufficiently proved a factual element, i.e., that the defendant has a prior conviction.” (584

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).