Skip to main content

Miller v. State

Citations

  • 33 S.W.3d 257
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 111
  • 2000 WL 1830208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts are to presume that the legislature was aware of current judicial opinions when enacting a statute
  • finding counsel's statement that defendant was already serving two sentences sufficient to link defendant to two prior convictions
  • finding counsel's admission that defendant was serving thirty years sufficient to prove prior convictions where convictions were identified in pretrial motion by cause number, name of offense, and punishment assessed
  • finding counsel's admission that defendant was serving thirty years sufficient to prove prior convictions where convictions were identified in pretrial motion by cause number, name of offense, and punishment assessed
  • similarly construing trial court's authority to cumulate current sentences with those of prior convictions under section 42.08 of the code of criminal procedure
  • admission by defendant’s attorney that defendant was serving thirty years constituted sufficient evidence linking defendant to prior convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Womack, Meyers, Holland, Johnson, Keasler, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.