Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/28/1998
State v. Guzman
Citations
- 959 S.W.2d 631
- 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12
- 1998 WL 28103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the State failed to sustain its burden of proof because Estep himself failed to complete the inventory of the vehicle and was unaware if it was completed by Meddor or by any other officer
- \[P]olice who are engaged in a caretaking search may inventory the contents of a lawfully impounded vehicle.\
- this Court required to overrule its federal constitutional decisions that conflict with United States Supreme Court federal constitutional decisions
- following United States v. Johns , 469 U.S. 478, 105 S. Ct. 881, 83 L. Ed. 2d 890 (1985); Michigan v. Thomas , 458 U.S. 259, 102 S. Ct. 3079, 73 L. Ed. 2d 750 (1982); Florida v. Meyers , 466 U.S. 380, 104 U.S. 380, 104 S. Ct. 1852, 80 L. Ed. 2d 381 (1984
- courts required to follow Supreme Court precedent on matters of federal constitutional law
- “[W]e hold, as Supreme Court precedent dictates, that the automobile exception to the 11 Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution does not require the existence of exigent circumstances in addition to probable cause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyers, McCormick, Baird, Mansfield, Keller, Price, Holland, Womack, Overstreet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
150 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-14· cited 1,653×
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-13· cited 942×
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-18· cited 903×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-11-18· cited 378×
- State v. William L. Witt(074468)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-09-24· cited 276×
- Meekins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-05-04· cited 232×
- Hulit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-16· cited 227×
- Ex parte ArgentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-03-20· cited 201×
- Josey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-10-22· cited 177×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-22· cited 169×
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-05-24· cited 145×
- Miller, Arthur Franklin Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-05-23· cited 144×
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-06-09· cited 119×
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2008-08-14· cited 94×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-03-31· cited 71×
- Planter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-12-15· cited 69×
- Ex Parte Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-09· cited 49×
- Dahlem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-07-15· cited 49×
- Oswaldo Javier Reyes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-02-09· cited 43×
- Medley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-05-23· cited 42×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court· 1996-07-01· cited 668×
- United States v. JohnsSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 515×
- Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 409×
- Michigan v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 390×
- Florida v. MeyersSupreme Court· 1984-04-23· cited 165×
- Gauldin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-26· cited 138×
- Samudio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-02-09· cited 105×
- Maldonado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-10-15· cited 72×
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-02· cited 23×
- State v. GuzmanTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1997-06-18· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.