Martinez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that definition of \reasonable doubt\ at the punishment phase is not required, absent a request, and that a failure to object or request definition results in waiver under the holding in Fields, 1 S.W.3d at 688
• no requirement of Geesa instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Taylor
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-02-28· cited 211×
• Reynolds v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-05-31· cited 83×
• Boone v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-29· cited 41×
• Arnold v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1999-12-08· cited 22×
• Jacky Clay Reynolds v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-05-31
• John Paul Garza v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-07-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Geesa v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 2,157×
• Fields v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-09-15· cited 178×
• Ex Parte Augusta
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-06· cited 120×
• Bell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-06-09· cited 119×
• Reyes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-30· cited 105×
• Martinez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-06-18· cited 14×