Supreme Court· 6/26/1998

Monge v. California

Citations

524 U.S. 721
118 S. Ct. 2246
141 L. Ed. 2d 615
1998 U.S. LEXIS 4218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the federal Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply to noncapital sentencing enhancement proceedings
holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not preclude retrial in the noncapital sentencing context where the original sentence was reversed because there was insufficient evidence to support a recidivism sentence enhancement
holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not preclude retrial in the noncapital sentencing context where the original sentence was reversed because there was insufficient evidence to support a recidivism sentence enhancement
concluding that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply in the non-capital sentencing context
holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause is not applicable to noncapital sen- fencing proceedings
holding that the double jeopardy clause does not apply to non-capital sentencing proceedings; the case involved a “three-strikes” sentencing enhancement where the State had failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove one of the predicate offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scalia, O'Connor, Rehnquist, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Stevens, Scaula, Souter, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

340 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Monge v. California

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.