Skip to main content

Ivey v. State

Citations

  • 250 S.W.3d 121
  • 2007 WL 4245892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, when assessing harm from improperly admitted evidence during punishment phase of trial, appellate courts ask whether defendant received longer sentence or was harmed as result of erroneously admitted evidence
  • determining whether defendant “received a longer sentence or was harmed” as result of erroneously admitted evidence in assessing harm at punishment phase
  • explaining that erroneous admission of evidence is not constitutional error
  • explaining that erroneous admission of evidence is not constitutional error
  • affirming conviction because defendant had not demonstrated he received longer sentence or was harmed by admission of improper testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, Pemberton, Waldrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.