Skip to main content
· 10/11/2005

Xue Hong Yang v. United States Department of Justice and Attorney General Gonzales

Citations

  • 426 F.3d 520
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21943
  • 2005 WL 2496373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the BIA affirms in only some respects, we review the IJ’s decision as modified by the BIA’s decision
  • holding that when the BIA affirms the IJ’s decision in all respects but one, this Court reviews the IJ’s 3 decision as modified by the BIA
  • providing that in 18 circumstances where the BIA has modified the IJ decision, we 19 review the IJ’s decision as modified by the BIA
  • upholding denial of CAT relief based on same factual predicate as failed asylum and withholding claims
  • noting that when the BIA affirms the IJ’s decision in all respects but one, the appellate court must review the IJ's decision as modified by the BIA decision, “minus the single argument for denying relief that was rejected by the BIA”
  • reviewing the IJ’s decision minus the grounds for denying relief that the BIA declined to affirm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Raggi, Cote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.