Skip to main content
· 8/28/2012

Gjerjaj v. Holder

Citations

  • 691 F.3d 288
  • 2012 WL 3661425
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a VWP participant may not contest removal on the basis of an adjustment of status application filed after the participant overstays the 90-day period of authorized stay
  • “We review de novo questions of law, including 5 constitutional claims.”
  • reviewing constitutional claims de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leval, Sack, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.