· 8/28/2012
Gjerjaj v. Holder
Citations
- 691 F.3d 288
- 2012 WL 3661425
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18245
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a VWP participant may not contest removal on the basis of an adjustment of status application filed after the participant overstays the 90-day period of authorized stay
- “We review de novo questions of law, including 5 constitutional claims.”
- reviewing constitutional claims de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leval, Sack, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.