Xian Tuan Ye v. Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an inconsistency material to the alleged persecution that is the basis of a claim is substantial evidence
• holding that a “material inconsistency” regarding alleged past persecution was substantial evidence for an adverse credibility determination (citation omitted)
• holding that material inconsistency regarding basis 11 of applicant’s asylum claim is substantial evidence for 12 adverse credibility determination
• holding that a single inconsistency “concerning the nature of [the applicant’s] mistreatment ... afforded substantial evidence to support the adverse credibility finding”
• holding that a single material inconsistency relating to central aspect of an asylum claim provided substantial evidence for an adverse credibility determination
• holding that a material inconsistency regarding past persecution may be substantial evidence of a lack of credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).