Li Yong Cao v. United States Department of Justice & Attorney General Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a movant bears a “heavy burden of 5 demonstrating a likelihood that the new evidence presented would alter the result 6 in the case”
• providing that 18 failure to proffer material and previously unavailable 19 evidence is a permissible ground for the BIA to decline to 20 remand
• noting that petitioners seeking remand due to new evidence face heavy burden of demonstrating likelihood that new evidence would alter result in case
• noting that a motion to remand that relies on newly available evidence is held to the substantive requirements of a motion to reopen
• providing that a movant seeking remand for consideration of new evidence must present “material, previously unavailable evidence”
• noting that a motion to remand must establish an alien’s prima facie eligibility for relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).