Guo Qi Wang v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there is no indication that the applicant’s scheme to harvest and sell organs of deceased inmates had any political aspect or political objective
• rejecting a 10 mistranslation argument because petitioner “failed to identify any translation 11 errors that significantly alter[ed] the meaning of his testimony”
• finding the “serious reasons for believing” standard satisfied based on applicant’s admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).