Skip to main content

Roberts v. State

Citations

  • 568 So. 2d 1255
  • 1990 WL 130215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that defendant was aware of evidence that would show he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the crime
  • finding that legal claims or issues must be raised with the trial court in order to be preserved for appellate review
  • stating that claim of ineffective assistance of counsel will warrant an evidentiary hearing only where the defendant alleges \specific facts which are not conclusively rebutted by the record and which demonstrate a deficiency in performance that prejudiced the defendant\
  • finding no Brady violation where prosecution and defense have same access to alleged exculpatory evidence
  • finding claims not raised on direct appeal to be procedurally barred
  • defendant aware of evidence that would show he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.