Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 678 So. 2d 309
  • 1996 WL 166498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that recantation \simply offers nothing new\ because the witness had already been impeached at trial with a prior sworn statement which was consistent with the recantation
  • finding that recantation “simply offers nothing new” because the witness had already been impeached at trial with a prior sworn statement which was consistent with the recantation
  • finding that recantation “simply offers nothing new” because the witness had already been impeached at trial with a prior sworn statement which was consistent with the recantation
  • finding defendant’s reliance on Court’s traditional treatment of recantations as newly discovered evidence misplaced because defendant’s situation was not the typical case where a witness suddenly recanted his or her trial testimony years after the fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.