Skip to main content

Spann v. State

Citations

  • 91 So. 3d 812
  • 2012 WL 1868491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that because recanting testimony is so unreliable, a new trial will be granted only when it appears that the witness’s testimony changes to such an extent as to render a probable different verdict
  • stating that because recanting testimony is so unreliable, a new trial will be granted only when it appears that the witness’s testimony changes to such an extent as to render a probable different verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.