Skip to main content
· 11/25/2005

Perales-Cumpean v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 429 F.3d 977
  • 2005 WL 3150160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Congress enacted the VAWA to protect victims of abuse
  • rejecting “petitioner’s attempt to recast the BIA’s decision on extreme cruelty as a pure question of law” because it “involve[d] the exercise of agency discretion”
  • rejecting “petitioner’s attempt to recast the BIA’s decision ... as a pure question of law” because it “involve[d] the exercise of agency discretion”
  • rejecting “petitioner’s attempt to recast the BIA ’s decision on extreme cruelty as a pure question of law ” because it “involve[d] the exercise of agency discretion”
  • explaining limited judicial review of discretionary decisions under § 1229b(b)(2)(D)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Anderson, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.