Skip to main content
· 11/15/2012

Barrera-Quintero v. Holder, Jr.

Citations

  • 699 F.3d 1239
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23494
  • 2012 WL 5521836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Chevron deference extends to a nonprecedential, single-member BIA decision, as here, “if it relies on prior BIA precedent addressing the same question” (quoting Efagene v. Holder, 642 F.3d 918, 920 (10th Cir. 2011))
  • concluding there was no due process violation in a removal proceeding when an officer testified over the telephone from another state
  • granting deference to the BIA’s construction of the continuous-physical-presence statute in Romalez-Alcaide
  • “[A]s long as the interpretation is reasonable, we must defer to the agency’s construction of the statute.... ”
  • analyzing such minimal procedural due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Holloway, Matheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.