Sabido Valdivia v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that § 1252(a)(2)(B) “prohibits] review only of those ‘judgments’ [under § 1229b] that are discretionary in nature”
• discussing the court’s decision to “join . . . sister circuits and hold that we may review non-discretionary decisions”
• “[W]e lack jurisdiction to review a BIA decision that a petitioner has failed to demonstrate that removal would cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship.” (quotation omitted)
• adopting the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in Montero-Martinez
• adopting the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in Montero-Martinez

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).