Zawacki v. Realogy Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding retaliation claim unexhausted where CHRO charge laid out only a claim for discrimination and did not include information sufficient to conclude an investigation would have included a claim for retaliation
• dismissing disparate impact claim based on the plaintiff’s failure to allege a facially neutral practice or policy
• discussing exception to exhaustion requirement where alleged retaliation occurs because the employee files an administrative charge or lawsuit
• “Claimants are required to be sufficiently specific in their administrative charges so that the administrative agency and the respondent are put on notice as to what the claims are.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).