Richard Samuels v. Air Transport Local 504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that trial court grant non-moving party on Rule 50 motion “every reasonable inference that the jury might have drawn in its favor”
• noting that on a 12(b)(6) motion, “only the facts alleged in the pleadings, documents attached as exhibits or incorporated by reference in the pleadings and matters of which judicial notice may be taken are considered,”
• noting that the Court’s review on a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is limited to “the facts alleged in the pleadings and matters of which judicial notice may be taken” (citations omitted)
• “Relief from the [Rule 50] specificity requirement is available only to avoid ‘manifest injustice’ to the moving party.”
• \Relief from the [Rule 50] specificity requirement is available only to avoid 'manifest injustice' to the moving party.\
• “[The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] limit the grounds for judgment n.o.v. to those specifically raised in the prior motion for a directed verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).