Gina Williams v. New York City Housing Authority, Teamsters Local 237/i.b.t, Docket No. 04-2531-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “because the factual underpinnings” of the plaintiff’s claim were presented in the plaintiff’s EEOC complaint, the plaintiff had exhausted her administrative remedies
• holding that plaintiff’s sex discrimination claim was “reasonably related” to the sexual harassment claim in her EEOC charge because the “factual underpinnings of a gender discrimination claim were presented in the complaint made to the EEOC”
• holding that a plaintiff asserting Title VII claims must first present these claims in a complaint before EEOC or the appropriate state agency and must subsequently “receive a ‘Notice of Right to Sue’ letter from the EEOC”
• stating that a Title VII claimant must make an EEOC filing within 300 days of the alleged discriminatory conduct
• holding sex discrimination claim to be reasonably related to retaliation claim in EEOC complaint where plaintiff did not check the box for “sex” in her EEOC complaint, but did include factual allegations consistent with sex discrimination
• rejecting per se rule that a charge of discrimination is never reasonably related to an EEOC charge alleging only retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).