Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/13/2005
Kelly v. State
Citations
- 163 S.W.3d 722
- 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 569
- 2005 WL 858027
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that even absent evidence of plea negotiations occurring, it was reasonable for trial court to infer that delay was attributable to such negotiations
- concluding that because the defendant’s “assertion [of his speedy trial right] was tardy . . . was made only once, and trial occurred within a relatively short time thereafter,” this factor weighed against the defendant
- concluding factor weighed against appellant when assertion of right was tardy and trial occurred two months after
- recognizing in speedy trial case that “the trial court is permitted to disbelieve evidence so long as there is a reasonable articulable basis for doing so”
- noting that because “[a]ppellant’s assertion was tardy, it was made only 5 once, and trial occurred within a relatively short time thereafter,” this factor did not weigh in favor of the appellant
- finding delay of more than one year in asserting right to speedy trial, and fact that trial occurred only two months later, weighed against defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keller, Meyers, Price, Holcomb, Cochran, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
122 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-04-25· cited 1,486×
- Montanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-04-26· cited 952×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-07· cited 413×
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-01-14· cited 359×
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-06-25· cited 156×
- Jason Alexander Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-05-29· cited 45×
- Starks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2008-09-25· cited 42×
- Blaylock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-05-14· cited 34×
- Hill v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-01-11· cited 30×
- Harvey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-09-07· cited 27×
- Thien Quoc Nguyen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2016-11-09· cited 25×
- State v. RuddTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-07-02· cited 24×
- State v. FisherTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-09-20· cited 22×
- Palacios v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2006-04-05· cited 21×
- Ortegon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-10-22· cited 18×
- Dokter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-02-13· cited 15×
- State v. ManleyTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-02-07· cited 14×
- Charles Edward Barringer, Jr. v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2013-02-28· cited 13×
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-03-29· cited 8×
- Richard Scott Purgason v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2013-05-13· cited 4×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-11-29· cited 3,729×
- Zamorano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 502×
- State v. MunozCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-02-17· cited 471×
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-03-31· cited 375×
- Manzi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-23· cited 228×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-26· cited 190×
- Moreno v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1999-06-09· cited 26×
- Kelly v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-11-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.