Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/26/1997
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 954 S.W.2d 770
- 1997 WL 592635
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the due course of law Clause in Article 1, Section 19 of the Texas Constitution also protects against certain types of pre-indictment delay
- “The balancing test as a whole, however, is a purely legal question . . . reviewed de novo.”
- “The balancing test as a whole, however, is a purely legal question . . . reviewed de novo.”
- “The balancing test as a whole, however, is a purely legal question . . . reviewed de 4 novo.”
- in reviewing trial courts' decisions on federal constitutional speedy-trial claims, appellate courts may conduct de novo review by independently weighing and balancing the four Barker factors
- in reviewing trial courts’ decisions on federal constitutional speedy-trial claims, appellate courts may conduct de novo review by independently weighing and balancing the four Barker factors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keller, Overstreet, Meyers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
142 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zamorano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 502×
- Karenev v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-04-22· cited 453×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-07· cited 413×
- Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-11-02· cited 297×
- Moon, CameronCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-12-10· cited 156×
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-06-25· cited 156×
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-04-13· cited 147×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-14· cited 124×
- Rivera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-04-15· cited 61×
- State v. RangelTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-09-30· cited 57×
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. StocktonTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2001-06-13· cited 53×
- Russell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-01-22· cited 43×
- Mabra v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1999-07-09· cited 43×
- Holley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-06-21· cited 38×
- State v. JonesTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-07-26· cited 38×
- Floyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-08· cited 35×
- Yanes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-10-06· cited 35×
- Blaylock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-05-14· cited 34×
- Hill v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-01-11· cited 30×
- Haney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-02· cited 27×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Villarreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-20· cited 1,246×
- Emery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-05-11· cited 456×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-01-05· cited 257×
- Chapman v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-27· cited 108×
- State v. HernandezTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1992-03-25· cited 43×
- State v. KuriCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-01-14· cited 33×
- State v. OwensTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1990-01-17· cited 27×
- State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-12-07· cited 21×
- State v. DeBlancTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1993-06-30· cited 6×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-06-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.