Orand v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that A time = s erosion of exculpatory evidence and testimony can rarely be shown @
• noting that “time’s erosion of exculpatory evidence and testimony can rarely be shown”
• noting that “time’s erosion of exculpatory evidence and testimony can rarely be shown”
• eleven-year, eight-month delay weighed “very, very heavily” against the State where no explanation was offered for delay between indictment and arrest
• unaware of indictment until his arrest more than eleven years later, defendant timely filed post-judgment motion to dismiss
• eleven-year, eight-month delay weighed “very, very heavily” against the State where no explanation was offered for delay between indictment and arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).