Skip to main content

Spencer v. State

Citations

  • 162 S.W.3d 877
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 3162
  • 2005 WL 975672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that initial police-victim interaction at crime scene was non-testimonial
  • holding that initial police-victim interaction at crime scene was non-testimonial
  • stating that complainant’s responses to police questions were not testimonial because they occurred after the police arrived at the scene and while the police were assessing and securing the scene
  • collecting cases from Texas and other jurisdictions holding, generally, that preliminary questions by police at the scene of a crime while police are assessing and securing the scene are not testimonial
  • rejecting “bright-line rule that excited utterances can never be testimonial,” but recognizing nature of spontaneous utterance as factor to be considered in assessing whether statement “testimonial”
  • stating responses to preliminary questions by the police at the scene of the crime while assessing and securing the scene are not testimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leslie Brock Yates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.