Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/22/1983
Andrews v. State
Citations
- 652 S.W.2d 370
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failing to define “prurient interest,” a term not statutorily defined, was not error although it may have acquired a technical meaning
- trial court’s instruction held reversible error as “jury [could not] perform its function of being the exclusive judge of facts.”
- “The general rule is that it is usually permissible to track the pertinent part of the charging instrument when preparing the application paragraph.”
- “When the Legislature enacted the present Texas obscenity statute, it was attempting to comply with the Supreme Court decision of Miller v. California”
- A The general rule is that it is usually permissible to track the pertinent part of the charging instrument when preparing the application paragraph. @
- “We therefore hold that the Texas obscenity statute is not unconstitutional because statutory term “patently offensive” is defined in terms of a community standard of decency. The statute is neither vague nor overbroad because of this fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Teague, Onion, Clinton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-04-23· cited 572×
- Roise v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-12-02· cited 252×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-12-15· cited 215×
- Willis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-16· cited 210×
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-06· cited 72×
- People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-02-25· cited 67×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-04· cited 66×
- Alexander v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-08-03· cited 56×
- Delapaz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-08-03· cited 56×
- Tovar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-04-20· cited 49×
- Crum v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-04-24· cited 47×
- Yorko v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 38×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-01-23· cited 34×
- Gholson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1984-01-06· cited 29×
- State v. BollesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-10-18· cited 26×
- State v. LongeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-09-24· cited 22×
- Clark v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-12-01· cited 21×
- Hoa Ho v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-05-13· cited 20×
- Varkonyi v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2008-10-29· cited 16×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-08-07· cited 16×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1925-06-08· cited 1,060×
- Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1974-06-24· cited 409×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-23· cited 285×
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-11· cited 143×
- Doyle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-28· cited 125×
- Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. VanceFifth Circuit· 1981-06-23· cited 73×
- Milligan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-01· cited 60×
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-01-12· cited 60×
- Olveda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-16· cited 54×
- Grady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-16· cited 53×
- Ex Parte ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-11-28· cited 37×
- Flying Eagle Publications, Inc. v. United States of America, Michael St. John v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1960-01-21· cited 36×
- United States v. Walter \Frenchy\ BagnellEleventh Circuit· 1982-06-28· cited 36×
- Bryers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-05-31· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.