· 11/15/2001
Brightman v. State
Citations
- 758 N.E.2d 41
- 2001 Ind. LEXIS 994
- 2001 WL 1450751
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing Tumulty in part because “the trial court heard evidence on the motion, reviewed the claim, and rejected it”
- “Moreover, even if the State’s position was contrary to its previous one, judicial estoppel would apply only if the court had acted on the state’s prior request.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.