Skip to main content
· 11/15/2001

Brightman v. State

Citations

  • 758 N.E.2d 41
  • 2001 Ind. LEXIS 994
  • 2001 WL 1450751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Tumulty in part because “the trial court heard evidence on the motion, reviewed the claim, and rejected it”
  • “Moreover, even if the State’s position was contrary to its previous one, judicial estoppel would apply only if the court had acted on the state’s prior request.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.