Supreme Court· 3/9/1992

Stringer v. Black

Citations

503 U.S. 222
112 S. Ct. 1130
117 L. Ed. 2d 367
1992 U.S. LEXIS 1533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

federal relief available if state courts’ interpretation of existing precedent objectively unreasonable
no new rule established where the prior case's rule \emerges not from any single case ... but from our long line of authority\ on the matter and, despite differences in the petitioner's case, the result petitioner seeks \follows a fortiori \ from the earlier case
no new rule established where the prior cases rule \emerges not from any single case . . . but from our long line of authority\ on the matter and, despite differences in the petitioners case, the result petitioner seeks \follows a fortiori\ from the earlier case
Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-101 (1993)
Miss.Code Ann. ง 99-19-101 (1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Kennedy, Rehnquist, Souter, Stevens, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

464 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Stringer v. Black

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.