Supreme Court of Georgia· 12/5/1983
Williams v. State
Citations
- 251 Ga. 749
- 312 S.E.2d 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a microspectrophotometer graph printout was not a scientific report discoverable under OCGA § 17-7-211, which was repealed and reenacted to apply to misdemeanor cases. See OCGA § 17-16-23; Ga. L. 1994, p. 1895, § 4
- allowing expert evidence linking fibers in defendant's home to fibers found on homicide victims
- allowing expert evidence linking fibers in defendant's home to fibers found on homicide victims
- setting out the criteria for proper admission of other crimes evidence
- \[i]t is for the trial court to determine whether a given scientific principle or technique is competent evidence\
- “[i]t is for the trial court to determine whether a given scientific principle or technique is competent evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
210 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-07· cited 447×
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-21· cited 218×
- Felker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1984-03-15· cited 196×
- McClain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-11-12· cited 179×
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-07-03· cited 157×
- Homer Williams and Mrs. Faye Williams v. City of AtlantaEleventh Circuit· 1986-08-15· cited 111×
- Ledford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-02-21· cited 108×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-03-02· cited 107×
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-05-25· cited 101×
- Pace v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-12-03· cited 86×
- United States v. William Riley, Norman Burnett, Jeffrey Sizemore, Vincent MazzaSecond Circuit· 1990-06-22· cited 85×
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-03-19· cited 84×
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-03-10· cited 82×
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-19· cited 75×
- Mobley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-03-17· cited 74×
- Lobdell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-03-12· cited 73×
- Harwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-01· cited 70×
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-06-11· cited 69×
- McIntyre v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-11-06· cited 61×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-05-26· cited 58×
Cites
120 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,808×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-12-01· cited 743×
- Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1979-01-23· cited 375×
- Gibbons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-02-03· cited 353×
- Timberlake v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-09-23· cited 307×
- State v. JustMontana Supreme Court· 1979-10-22· cited 262×
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-06-02· cited 229×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.