· 6/24/1981
Gibbons v. State
Citations
- 629 P.2d 1196
- 97 Nev. 299
- 1981 Nev. LEXIS 513
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- judgment of conviction reversed where jury’s deliberations at trial were unduly prejudiced and influenced by admission of improper evidence
- where the defense suggests a motive to fabricate, corroborative testimony introduced for the purpose of rehabilitation must affirmatively show that the repeated statement was originally made at a time when the declarant had no motive to fabricate
- prosecutor repeated the erroneously admitted testimony in closing
- prosecutor repeated the erroneously admitted testimony in closing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.