Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 369 S.E.2d 232
  • 258 Ga. 305
  • 1988 Ga. LEXIS 226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting two generally recognized grounds for disqualification of prosecutor: conflict of interest and “forensic misconduct” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • noting in dicta that prosecutor’s knowing use of perjured testimony would constitute a due process violation
  • not even the prosecutor’s knowing use of perjured testimony, perhaps the most heinous form of prosecutorial misconduct, bars retrial
  • not even the prosecutor's knowing use of perjured testimony, perhaps the most heinous form of prosecutorial misconduct, bars retrial
  • “[I]t is generally the rule that by making a motion for mistrial the defendant thereby waives any claim of double jeopardy.”
  • “The primary purpose underlying the Double Jeopardy Clause is to prohibit the retrial of a criminal defendant where the prosecution has, at the initial trial, produced insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.