Skip to main content

Price v. State

Citations

  • 498 S.E.2d 262
  • 269 Ga. 222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a trial court has the discretion to quash an unreasonable and oppressive subpoena
  • noting that a trial court has the discretion to quash an unreasonable and oppressive subpoena
  • noting that appellate decisions have routinely held that Miranda warnings must precede a request to perform a field sobriety test only when the suspect is “in custody”
  • stating that “[i]n order to admit results of a blood test showing a defendant’s blood alcohol level, the state must prove that the blood was withdrawn by a “qualified” person under the applicable statute.
  • reversing quash of defendant’s subpoena for gas chromatography printout recording his blood alcohol level
  • “[H]avingbeen informed that she was going to jail, a reasonable person would have believed that the detention was not temporary. Therefore, the failure to give the Miranda warnings renders evidence regarding the field sobriety tests inadmissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.