Tenth Circuit· 2/24/2017

Williams v. Fedex Corporate Services

Citations

849 F.3d 889
33 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 481
2017 WL 727134
2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that alleged “disciplinary action” from supervisors was insufficient to demonstrate an atmosphere “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult.” (citation omitted)
denying liability where there was no evidence that anyone at employer knew of disability
rejecting hostile work environment claim based on evidence that plaintiff struggled under heavy workload, received no relief when he asked for help, and was belittled, berated, and disciplined by his supervisors
denying a motion to seal after the parties agreed that the “district court’s summary judgment order may now be unsealed, even though the order describes and even quotes in it much of the information [the Appellant] now seeks to keep under seal”
plaintiff could not show pretext where employer relied in good faith on notification from insurance company that plaintiff suffered from substance abuse
ADA, which uses the same standards as the Rehabilitation Act, see Wilkerson v. Shinseki, 606 F.3d 1256, 1262 (10th Cir. 2010)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes, Matheson, McHUGH

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.