Johnson v. Weld County, Colo.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that failure of employer to follow policy as to all applicants did not show pretext
• concluding that “cold shoulder” and general avoidance from supervisors are insufficient to show material adversity
• holding that while the form of evidence produced by nonmoving party at summary judgment may not need to be admissible at trial, content or substance of the evidence must be admissible
• holding that “cold shoulder” treatment wasn’t a materially adverse employment action
• holding that the role of the Court “isn’t to ask whether the employer’s decision was wise, fair or correct, but whether it honestly believed the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons it gave for its conduct and acted in good faith on those beliefs”
• explaining that a plaintiff cannot show pretext even if the employment decision was a bad one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).