Tenth Circuit· 5/14/2013

Koessel v. Sublette County Sheriff's Department

Citations

717 F.3d 736
27 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1569
2013 WL 1960568
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that even if employer’s reliance on a report was pretextual, “its reliance [nevertheless] provided the department with rational reasons for its decision”
“The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment applies only to action by the federal government ….”
“It is not the employer’s responsibility to anticipate the employee’s needs and affirmatively offer accommodation if the employer is otherwise open to such requests.”
“A position is vacant when a similarly situated, non-disabled employee would be able to apply for it.”
“It is not the employer’s responsibility to anticipate the employee’s needs and affirmatively offer accommodation if the employer is otherwise open to such requests.”
defining the right to substantive due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tymkovich, Ebel, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.