Skip to main content

Whack v. State

Citations

  • 433 Md. 728
  • 73 A.3d 186
  • 2013 WL 4436602
  • 2013 Md. LEXIS 571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding trial court erred in denying mistrial because prosecutor in closing argument \told jurors that [defendant's] DNA was present\ when expert actually testified \she could not exclude [defendant] as being the source of DNA\
  • finding trial court erred in denying mistrial because prosecutor in closing argument \told jurors that [defendant's] DNA was present\ when expert actually testified \she could not exclude [defendant] as being the source of DNA\
  • analyst’s testimony that defendant’s DNA might have been present at the scene did not support prosecutor’s argument, “stating emphatically that [the defendant’s] DNA was present”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.