Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/29/1994
State v. Bloom
Citations
- 516 N.W.2d 159
- 1994 Minn. LEXIS 290
- 1994 WL 169980
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing problems with unmodified product rule and finding product-rule calculation modified by ceiling principle to be admissible
- recognizing that the \admission of the random match probability figure will confuse jurors\
- recognizing that the \admission of the random match probability figure will confuse jurors\
- stating \we will not hesitate to award a new trial . . . if . . . DNA identification evidence was presented in a misleading or improper way\
- stating \we will not hesitate to award a new trial . . . if . . . DNA identification evidence was presented in a misleading or improper way\
- expressly sanctioning the use of “reasonable scientific certainty” in the context of DNA evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith, Gardebring, Tomljanovich, Coyne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-11-18· cited 289×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-30· cited 272×
- People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-09-06· cited 198×
- People v. VenegasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-05-11· cited 134×
- Fugate v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 101×
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-20· cited 95×
- State v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-31· cited 58×
- People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-23· cited 48×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-03-18· cited 45×
- State v. HannonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-18· cited 43×
- People v. HeatonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-09-13· cited 42×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-07· cited 36×
- State v. Roman NoseSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-22· cited 34×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1998-01-21· cited 34×
- State v. MarcusNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-10-17· cited 31×
- State v. Roman NoseSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-21· cited 29×
- State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-16· cited 27×
- State v. IsleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-04-25· cited 24×
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-09-24· cited 23×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-06-07· cited 22×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals· 1994-03-29· cited 282×
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-03-11· cited 205×
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-01-02· cited 179×
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-15· cited 177×
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-03· cited 141×
- United States v. Adrian Paul MartinezEighth Circuit· 1993-09-02· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. CurninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-01-24· cited 124×
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-05-26· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-07-20· cited 67×
- State v. JobeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-06-26· cited 52×
- People v. WatsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-01-28· cited 42×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-03-19· cited 36×
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-01· cited 29×
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-03-08· cited 21×
- State v. NielsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-04-05· cited 21×
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-04-29· cited 11×
- State v. AltSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-09-21· cited 7×
- State v. ReanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-08-31· cited 6×
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-04-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.