Skip to main content

State v. Hawkins

Citations

  • 604 A.2d 489
  • 326 Md. 270
  • 1992 Md. LEXIS 56

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial judge should have clarified that accessory after the fact and the predicate felony are mutually exclusive
  • concluding that the trial judge should have clarified that accessory after the fact and the predicate felony are mutually exclusive
  • explaining that the “[trial] judge has his finger on the pulse of the trial” and is in the best position to discern “the reaction of the jurors” to inadmissible references to a polygraph
  • observing that “[t]he common law is not cast in concrete; it is subject to change by legislative enactment and by judicial decision” and that this Court “has not been reluctant to change the common law”
  • observing that “where there are multiple offenses involved, . . . the remedy for an error in the instructions on one of the offenses depends upon the degree to which the erroneous instruction taints each individual conviction”
  • the determination of prejudice is best left to the trial judge because it is he who “has his finger on the pulse of the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Chasanow, Karwacki, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.