Degren v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “attorneys are afforded great leeway in presenting closing arguments to the jury.”
• noting “the general rule that attorneys are afforded great leeway in presenting closing arguments to the jury”
• noting \the general rule that attorneys are afforded great leeway in presenting closing arguments to the jury\
• discussing different Maryland statute using same language as relevant portion of the former Maryland statute
• “ ‘[w]e are not constrained ... by ... “the literal or usual meaning” of the terms at issue.’ ”
• “This Court has held that, under certain circumstances, a prosecutor’s argument during rebuttal and in response to comments made by the defense during its closing are proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).