Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding by New Jersey Supreme Court that a plaintiff may recover from a spoliator even if the plaintiff prevails in the original suit
• stating that CEPA requires “a sufficient expression” of an employee's disagreement to put the employer on notice
• noting that a spoliation claim requires a showing that \the evidence was material to the litigation\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• explaining that in enacting CEPA, the Legislature intended for it to contain a \statutory provision that deems the filing of a CEPA complaint to be an election of remedies\
• explaining that in enacting CEPA, the Legislature intended for it to contain a \statutory provision that deems the filing of a CEPA complaint to b e an election of remedies\
• explaining that the claim in Pierce was “in the nature of constructive discharge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).