Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/16/2009
Mitchell v. State
Citations
- 969 A.2d 989
- 408 Md. 368
- 2009 Md. LEXIS 53
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- involved the prosecutor’s comments about defense counsel’s right to subpoena witnesses, after defense counsel referred to certain witnesses whom the State failed to call
- “Generally, counsel has the right to make any comment or argument that is warranted by the evidence proved or inferences therefrom”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Murphy, Adkins, Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 75×
- Fuentes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-07-12· cited 45×
- State v. NightingaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-07-23· cited 40×
- Donaldson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-26· cited 30×
- State v. ManerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-01-28· cited 22×
- James v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-24· cited 19×
- Sivells v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-02· cited 15×
- 98 Lords Highway, LLC v. One Hundred Lords Highway, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-10-23· cited 15×
- Whack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-21· cited 15×
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-07-27· cited 14×
- Little v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-22· cited 13×
- Khaliq Khan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-04· cited 13×
- McFadden and Miles v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-02-03· cited 12×
- Winston, Mayhew & Cannon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-02-02· cited 10×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-29· cited 10×
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-21· cited 10×
- Shelton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-05· cited 7×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 6×
- State v. Gutierrez & Perez-LazaroCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-28· cited 6×
- Beads v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-21· cited 5×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 4,689×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 647×
- People v. KlinerIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 564×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-15· cited 210×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- State v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-02-07· cited 113×
- United States v. HernandezEleventh Circuit· 1998-07-17· cited 112×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-09· cited 107×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-27· cited 97×
- United States v. David Lloyd NickensFirst Circuit· 1992-01-29· cited 96×
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-10-11· cited 91×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-08· cited 89×
- United States v. Robert Blackman, Marvin Hinsey, Kenny Thompson, Salathiel Calvin ThompsonEleventh Circuit· 1995-10-20· cited 87×
- State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-07· cited 72×
- Spain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-07· cited 70×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-31· cited 69×
- United States v. Leonard Lee WilliamsNinth Circuit· 1993-04-08· cited 64×
- Doby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-02-14· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.