Skip to main content

West v. Thurston County

Citations

  • 275 P.3d 1200
  • 168 Wash. App. 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts will not consider conclusory arguments that do not cite factual and legal authority
  • “ʻPassing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration.’”
  • passing 15 No. 49669-1-II treatment of an issue or lack of any reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration
  • “‘[p]assing treatment of an issue or lack 30 No. 48590-7-II/ No. 48774-8-II of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration’” (alteration in original
  • refusing to consider issues that were not developed in the briefing
  • declining to consider issues that were not argued in the briefing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunt, Armstrong, Quinn-Brintnall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named West v. Thurston County

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.