· 4/22/1974
Fite v. Lee
Citations
- 521 P.2d 964
- 11 Wash. App. 21
- 97 A.L.R. 3d 678
- 1974 Wash. App. LEXIS 1201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- attorney could be held separately liable for the use of writs of garnishment when the use of those procedures constituted an abuse of process
- attorney could be held separately liable for the use of writs of garnishment when the use of those procedures constituted an abuse of process
- “The order of dismissal thereafter entered was in the nature of a judgment by consent, which, in the absence of fraud or mistake or want of jurisdiction, will not be reviewed on appeal.”
- “The order of dismissal . . . was in the nature of a judgment by consent, which, in the absence of fraud or mistake or want of jurisdiction, will not be reviewed on appeal.”
- “The order of dismissal . . . was in the nature of a judgment by consent, which, in the absence of fraud or mistake or want of jurisdiction, will not be reviewed on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.