Skip to main content
· 4/22/1974

Fite v. Lee

Citations

  • 521 P.2d 964
  • 11 Wash. App. 21
  • 97 A.L.R. 3d 678
  • 1974 Wash. App. LEXIS 1201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • attorney could be held separately liable for the use of writs of garnishment when the use of those procedures constituted an abuse of process
  • attorney could be held separately liable for the use of writs of garnishment when the use of those procedures constituted an abuse of process
  • “The order of dismissal thereafter entered was in the nature of a judgment by consent, which, in the absence of fraud or mistake or want of jurisdiction, will not be reviewed on appeal.”
  • “The order of dismissal . . . was in the nature of a judgment by consent, which, in the absence of fraud or mistake or want of jurisdiction, will not be reviewed on appeal.”
  • “The order of dismissal . . . was in the nature of a judgment by consent, which, in the absence of fraud or mistake or want of jurisdiction, will not be reviewed on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.